I gave them a lecture about Earthmen, and I told them of Edwin and all of you at 'Q' Base.
The students are very interested and agree that this has been a valuable experience.
The key to the harnessing of universal power is harmony, goodwill, peace... It is the worst magnetic storm for a long time."If I cannot leave within a week," Eeso continued, "I will have to land in one of your seas.
You may find this hard to accept, but it is the truth.1975, and ended about nine months later. It must be sufficiently deep to allow this craft to settle on the bottom.
But he is at present on a mission which has taken him away.
But I have been given all the facts as recorded in the memory banks or archives on Grandor.
" A giant warhead containing missiles, each of which was capable of destroying an area of at least 160 kilometers in diameter, was launched from one of the moons. It was almost total destruction for the North and thegiant arsenals exploded, shock after shock rocked the planet. When these died down the greater ordeal began for those who survived the initial blasts.
I would not be surprised if he is from the North polar region. The method you used to get Edwin into trance is like an 'open house'. That is why we use the other method, using the sounds to induce the receptive state. (**Party line: A word peculiar to southern Africa meaning a telephone number shared by more than one person, where the call is distinguished by the number or length of the rings.
Then intense radiation storms scarred the planet, searing its go underground -beneath the surface to escape the poisons of destructive radiation.
Settlements, and later cities, were built below the surface and power was generated to illuminate the underground cities. "A" Base is, according to my records here, 72 kilometers from your position there.
And if the words in which we read the scientist;s own unfolding story of his science are all cold and calculated, empty of foible or failing, above even mention of mistake, how are we to divine that in the vast majority of moments when he is not writing, the scientist is a genial, sensible, rather humble man?
By what occult power are we to recognize that his "objective evaluations" in the scientific journals are actually not magnificent infallibilities but fortunate conclusions of persistently prusued hunches, exhaustively explored intuitions, and unexpected observations? And if the words in which we read the scientist;s own unfolding story of his science are all cold and calculated, empty of foible or failing, above even mention of mistake, how are we to divine that in the vast majority of moments when he is not writing, the scientist is a genial, sensible, rather humble man?
How the planet became uninhabitable and how the population had to start life again elsewhere.